Tuesday, October 20, 2009

White House v. Fox News



White House senior adviser David Axelrod told George Stephanopoulos Fox News is not really a news network. The Daily Show has successfully made that point for several years.


It's really not news. It's pushing a point of view. And the bigger thing is that other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way, and we're not going to treat them that way. We're going to appear on their shows. We're going to participate but understanding that they represent a point of view."


The White House attack on Fox News has forced the network to make laughable arguments about how tough they were on President George W. Bush. Brit Hume and Bill O'Reilly claim the network held Bush accountable for mistakes in Iraq.

"I haven't seen any evidence of GOP intrusion," O'Reilly said.

What about Fox News passing Senate Republican Communications Center talking points as actual reporting? How about Fox News saying, "All-Out Civil War in Iraq: Could It Be a Good Thing?" Fox News does not do investigative journalism. The running joke is the network worker bees marched to John Moody's orders.


From: John Moody
Date: 4/6/2004

The events in Iraq Tuesday are going to be the top story, unless and until something else (or worse) happens. Err on the side of doing too much Iraq rather than not enough. Do not fall into the easy trap of mourning the loss of US lives and asking out loud why are we there? The US is in Iraq to help a country brutalized for 30 years protect the gains made by Operation Iraqi Freedom and set it on the path to democracy. Some people in Iraq don't want that to happen. That is why American GIs are dying. And what we should remind our viewers.




MoveOn.org is running a petition asking Democrats to stay off Fox News.

Labels: , , , , ,

4 Comments:

At October 20, 2009 5:45 PM , Blogger tas said...

Brit Hume has the voice and demeanor of a man who drinks puppy blood at breakfast every morning.

 
At October 20, 2009 6:06 PM , Blogger Michael Hussey said...

That is probably the nicest thing you said about a Fox News staffer.

 
At October 21, 2009 2:39 PM , Blogger Michael Hussey said...

I haven't heard douchefuck? That must be new.

 
At October 21, 2009 4:47 PM , Blogger tas said...

I thought of "douchefuck" on the fly, but it's already in Urban Dictionary. The internetz simply kill the comforting perception of originality which existed before it localized the global.

On the scale of douchiness, though, "douchefuck" ranks pretty high. We have "douchebag" at the bottom.. Normal, run of the mill. It's like the missionary position of douche-related insults. Slightly above it is calling somebody French, quickly followed by "douchetard" -- a sweeping swipe against douches and retards. Luckily the latter group won't be angry about what's being said because they won't know what's going on. "Douchefuck" nests on top of "douchetard", and while most people consider the supreme douchiness of "douchefuck" makes it the king of douches, those of us in the know -- professionals, who get free subscriptions to "Insults Fucking Monthly" -- consider getting your picture on Hot Chicks with Douchebags to be the pinnacle of douchiness.

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home