Here it is boys and girls. The Florida Bar complaint proves that Paul Phillips and Peter Schorsch were off-the-record sources for Noah Pransky's WTSP negative hit piece on the Michael Pinson Foundation. Phillips admitted under oath that both Schorsch and him were sources for the WTSP story.
The bar complaint itself was dismissed. It is not illegal for Peter Schorsch and Paul Phillips to talk to the media. What should be noted is Schorsch has been accused of
repeatedly lying to the media by Adam Smith of
Tampa Bay Times.
Still, for his very campaign event Crist turned to Schorsch who routinely and unapologetically lies publicly to the press, who owes nearly $68,000 in outstanding fines to the Florida Elections Commission, who six years pleaded no contest to grand thef and scheming to defraud charges. Really?
Pinson claimed in the Florida Bar complaint that Noah Pransky attended Schorsch's wedding. Pransky would not answer that on-the-record. I asked Schorsch if he knew Chris Kapper. Schorsch would not comment. Kapper made an on-the-record claim that Pinson was using charity money to host hot tub parties. No second source verified this story in Pransky's new piece. Schorsch is Facebook friends with Kapper.
Kapper thanked Pransky for his "activism on Facebook. I have no idea of the context of the quote.
In the Florida Bar complaint Schorsch and Phillips admit to knowing Kapper.
There is a lot more in the complaint but it is obvious that the WTSP story is garbage.
The bar complaint itself was dismissed. It is not illegal for Peter Schorsch and Paul Phillips to talk to the media. What should be noted is Schorsch has been accused of repeatedly lying to the media by Adam Smith of Tampa Bay Times.
Kapper thanked Pransky for his "activism on Facebook. I have no idea of the context of the quote.
In the Florida Bar complaint Schorsch and Phillips admit to knowing Kapper.
There is a lot more in the complaint but it is obvious that the WTSP story is garbage.
So Pibnson is still a deuche bag who promoted himself pretending it was for charity, and there wa s alot in that story that has never been refuted. I give it no creditability that Pinsons ego fueled tirade has gone of for years and was used by the Times to attack an enemy of theirs.
ReplyDeletePeter, is it so nice to see you in my comments section. Are you still going to sue me for libel? I look forward to that.
ReplyDeleteMichael,
ReplyDeleteThat first comment is not from me. The document you have is written by Pinson, hence the bad grammar and poor diction.
Only you and he think it "proves" something.