Not only is the proposed contraceptive coverage mandate for religious employers bad policy, it is unconstitutional. It conflicts with the most basic elements of the freedoms of religion, speech, and association, as provided under the First Amendment. It would compel religious organizations to act, subsidize products, and affirmatively promote a message in contravention with their religious principles, with the sole alternative being to cease activities of incalculable value to their employees, constituents, and, indeed, society as a whole.
We strongly oppose the unconstitutional approach taken by the proposed contraceptive coverage mandate. We believe it represents an impermissible violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment virtually unparalleled in American history.
Accordingly, we urge you in the strongest way possible to refrain from promulgating the proposed regulations.
Sincerely,
Jon Bruning, Attorney General of Nebraska
Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas
Alan Wilson, Attorney General of South Carolina
Luther Strange, Attorney General of Alabama
Pam Bondi, Attorney General of Florida
James Caldwell, Attorney General of Louisiana
William Schneide, Attorney General of Maine
Wayne Stenehjem, Attorney General of North Dakota
Mike DeWine, Attorney General of Ohio
Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Marty J. Jackley, Attorney General of South Dakota
John W. Suthers, Attorney General of Colorado
If the health insurers are directly offering contraception to women, without involving the church, there is no rationale (however flimsy) of a violation of the First amendment. Catholic hospitals have no problem taking government Medicare and Medicaid dollars. However, Catholic bishops act like the end of days are upon us if the contraception is mentioned.
As for the Republicans, being the anti-birth control and anti-sex party makes them look insane to reasonable Americans. The sad thing is, I am not shocked that Republicans thought being anti-contraception is political gold.
No comments:
Post a Comment